Amazing News Reporting Differences When Attacker Is Black Instead of White

Let me start off by saying I don’t watch the news. I probably see about a minutes worth collectively over each week from when I walk through my living room when I get home from work and my wife has it on. So I don’t see much.

Yet somehow, every few months I manage to see the same type of crime- a black guy sucker-punching some old person in New York City.

Every time, it’s a youthful, say, 20-year-old black guy just walking past a 70-80-year-old white guy, and they just punch said old guy in the back of the head as they walk by. Because, you know, nothing says your tough like knocking out unsuspecting folks who are walking with canes and are 60 years your senior.

But the one I just saw a few days ago changed it up a bit, and this is the one I want to discuss today. This time it was a 40 or 48-year-old black man who sucker punched a 55 or 65-year-old Asian woman. Sorry, I don’t quite remember those age details, but it was definitely one of the those for each of them.

What’s astounding to me is how the news reported it. The attacker was constantly referred to as “a man.” Usually, the terms to describe an attacker are a little more detailed than “the man.” And they had his name, but did not use that either. Not once did they mention the man’s race.

So it seems a little unfair that the victim was immediately identified as Asian. Obviously, the news is trying to rile things up, but as the attacker was black, they could only do so much.

So the news showed footage of the attack, and basically summed it up to, “A man just walked up to a 55-year-old Asian woman and struck her on the back of the head with his fist, leaving her unconscious. Motives behind the man’s attack are unclear at this time. Police are investigating to find if it was racially motivated.”

This astounds me. Because the victim was Asian, everyone immediately jumps to a racial attack, but because the attacker was black, it might not have been. On all the other sucker-punch stories, when it’s a white man attacked, whether it was “racially motivated” or not is never mentioned or even thought of. Hmm…

Now imagine if the attacker was white. Suddenly, in big bold headlines, this story would become “Middle-aged White Male Attacks Senior Asian Woman! Hate Crime! It’s A HATE CRIIIIIIIIIIIME!!!! White Supremacy Must Be Squashed. It’s Burying The Minorities In The Streets Of The Big Apple!”

Following this news report would be all sorts of fun riots and protests.

So yeah, an interesting observation. More evidence that you can’t be racist against white people, but everything a white person does is racist. And fortunately black lives matter, maybe just a little more than Asians.

And by the way, they arrested the attacker. It was his 40th arrest. Why is he still among the living? He has certainly used up his life, and is doing nothing now but wasting valuable resources. They should have drowned him in the Hudson, like…38 arrests ago.

The Most Popular ESRB Ratings

You know those good old ratings stuck in the bottom corner of your video games, right? They are intended for parents to look at and decide if a game is appropriate for their precious child’s age.

In case you were unaware, these are our current ratings:

eC- early Childhood

E- Everyone

E10+- Everyone 10 & up

T- Teen

M- Mature 17+

Ao- Adults only 18+…you know, for when that game is so intense, that 17 year old needs one more year of life experience to handle.

Anyway, there are a lot of people who only play mature games, because then they won’t be men if they played something less.

Likewise, there are only people who play not mature games, if they have squeamish stomachs or whatever the reason.

Personally, the only rating I look out for is eC. For unless you are 5 and under, this isn’t going to be any fun at all, for these are mind-numbing educational games for toddlers, essentially. But really, your eyes are going to pass over any game like this anyway, so no worries!

But anyway, I have been writing Top 10 lists for most of my consoles, and have more recently been doing spin-off lists, if you will, such as the most popular years, and developers appearing on those lists.

Now, I would like to look into the ratings, and see which occurs most often on my lists. Perhaps then I can get a better idea of which rating produces the best games.

And who knows, this could help a parent out with purchasing games or consoles for their kids?

So here are the consoles and the ratings from my top 10 games!

Nintendo 3DS

E- 5 games

E10+- 4 games

T- 1 game

Nintendo DS

E- 6

E10+- 3

T- 1

Nintendo Game Boy

E- 9

E10+- 1

Nintendo Game Boy Advance

E- 10

Nintendo GameCube

E- 4

T- 6

Sega Genesis

E- 6

T- 1

(Not all titles rated for this one)

Nintendo Entertainment System

E- 10

Nintendo 64

E- 10

PC

T- 6

M- 5

Sony PlayStation

E- 6

T- 4

Sony PlayStation 2

E- 2

E10+- 2

T- 4

M- 2

Sony PlayStation 3

T- 5

M- 5

Super Nintendo Entertainment System

E- 9

(Not all titles were rated)

Nintendo Wii

E- 4

E10+- 2

T- 3

M- 1

Nintendo Wii U

E- 5

E10+- 3

T- 1

M- 1

PlayStation 4

E10+- 2

T- 1

M- 7

Well that’s it…now for the grand totals!

E10+ comes in last with 17 games making the top ten lists.

M with a count of 21 games.

Next is T with 32 games

And finally E with a crushing 85 games.

This is not surprising at all, especially since pretty much every game before 2002 is rated E.

As with all my other lists, I shall update this one as necessary.

Do You Find Yourself Losing Patience With Video Games The Older You Get?

I’m just curious if people are experiencing this as well. I’m nearly 30 years old now and noticed that the past few years I have had no patience for games…like at all. Granted, I’m a very impatient person to begin with, but I just can’t be bothered with a lot of them now.

I still beat every game I buy, (unless it is absolutely terrible/unplayable) but it seems like I rarely find one that I actually enjoy.

I just played a couple Fatal Frame games and Silent Hill for the first time, and really did not like them. If I was younger, I would have loved them. I just found them so boring. But it confirmed something I have been thinking lately…

I am a huge Resident Evil fan, but lately I’ve been wondering if I would like them now if I just played them for the first time like Silent Hill. Probably not, and this is because any game that involves you walking around looking for hidden items to place into spots to unlock other secrets just annoys me anymore. I didn’t mind walking all over the mansion in the original Resident Evil trying to find obscure keys and then trying to remember what door they belonged to when I did finally find them.

But now, forget it, I walk around for maybe five minutes, throw my hands up and say “screw it, I’ve had enough,” and immediately use a walkthrough to beat the game. This is what I did for the Fatal Frame games and Silent Hill. I just can’t be bothered to sit there and waste time trying to figure stuff out.

Other games that drive me crazy are the hard games that force you to use trial and error to beat it. I used to like this when I was younger and it always felt satisfying to me when I did beat them, but now it drives me crazy. And this is because somewhere down the line, I developed an extreme hate for repeating myself, this includes words I say, actions I do, and games I play. Once I do something, I want to be done with it. I can’t stand when I die, and get sent 10-15 minutes back and have to work my way all the way to the part I died, just to get three seconds further and die again, learning the game as I go, until I struggle through to the next checkpoint, only to repeat the process all over again. I HATE IT!!!

I credit all this impatience to the fact that I have severely less free time now than I did as a child and the ever growing backlog of games I have (which is nearing 500 now). I don’t want to waste my time playing the same parts over and over, or waste my time looking around like a lost child for something I don’t even really know I’m supposed to be looking for.

I just want to get through the games and enjoy them while doing so. This rarely seems to happen for me nowadays. Though I guess if the game is truly good, then I don’t mind doing all of the stuff I have no patience for (sort of), so maybe the problem is I just don’t like the games I’m playing? But again, I don’t even really like video games anymore. And yet I still buy them and play them all the time. It’s like a cursed drug!!

Does anybody else find themselves in similar situations as they get older?